The second difference is also physical, and relates to the rear TFT colour LCD monitor. Another place I could see this being of use is in a USB-equipped car. The X100T is a better overall camera, but I can see how some may have been underwhelmed with the new feature-set, and that is exactly why X100S owners are advised to consider carefully whether or not they need the upgrade. Looking for a Fujifilm X100T vs Fujifilm X100V comparison? The X100T follows that trend as its dials are nice and tight. Excluding iterative releases of the X100, the X70 marks Fuji’s second fixed focal length “Premium Compact Camera.” It came as a bit of a surprise alongside the announcement of the X-Pro2. The price is the same for you, but a small percentage of the purchase price goes to me, which helps keep this site going. On the X100T, you can use the old versions but you need to manually select the correct converter in the menu t… I really ought to write about some of the individual improvements as well. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm FinePix X100 and Fujifilm X100T and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer. I personally still lean towards PRO Neg. The buttons on the right of the LCD all work better in my opinion. I wish Fuji thought to add the cross-hatched grip here as well as the is the ring that needed it most in my opinion. bigger. resolution of 16 megapixels, compared with 12.2 MP of the X100. We heard everything from 24MP to a tilt screen to an all new lens design. The S is the first release, and the T contains all the refinements needed to cement the X100’s position as being the one Fuji camera I’d have, if I could only choose one. But the tilt action isn’t the only new feature of the LCD. No mushy D-pads here. Bigger is better, so long as size doesn’t come with cramped controls or compromised handling. will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently. Thanks! The X-E2 was a transitional period, but the X-T1 and X100T share D-pad functionality. I love it. Fuji were likely hoping to recapture the magic of the X100 again, but with a miniaturized version, and more consumer-centric features. With the X30, Fuji used a rubberized material that is so grippy, it would be really difficult to drop. As with the X-T2 and X-Pro2, Fujifilm has integrated a joystick-type lever among these. Hence, the decision which camera The depth of the grip is actually the same, but the depth of the rest of the body has slimmed down slightly giving the impression of more of a grip. Luckily we can now scroll through the menu with the rear Command Dial. The lens has finally received an upgrade as well, now sporting 2 aspherical elements vs 1 in the previous generation X100 cameras, so it should be sharper. Home I said it on Twitter and I’ll say it hear, a factory-modified firmware that includes and additional Film Simulation mode ≠ a shippable firmware update. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm website. The X100 was replaced by the Fujifilm X100S, while the X100T was followed by the Fujifilm X100F. The XF10 doesn’t have … We did get some minor improvements there, but they’re software related. In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the X100 or the X100T perform in practice. is best and worth buying is often a very personal one. The top plate has seen a number of minor refinements. For that reason, I’ll largely consider the X100 and X100S as interchangeable when it comes to hardware. A comparison between Fuji’s X100S or X100T with its 23mm f/2 lens and their FUJINON XF 23mm f/1.4 R including handling, sharpness, and bokeh. The Fujifilm FinePix X100 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-12800. However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. Any additional comment or suggestion for improvement would be welcome. This leads to a cleaner look on the front. So what conclusions can be drawn? The corresponding values for the Fujifilm X100 are It’s quite natural for your thumb to fall on the rear dial which can result in unintentional presses or selections. Both the X100 and the X100T have built-in prime lenses. the Fujifilm X100 and the Fujifilm X100T are of equal size. Sample Images top. The X100T is a further refinement to Fuji’s X100 line. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market. With that written new user interface is a bit of a mixed bag for me. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers. All contents © Fuji vs. Fuji, 2013 – 2020, Interchangeable Lens Body Spec Comparison, Adobe’s Fujifilm Camera Calibration Profiles, Where’s The X-Pro3 Review? For medium to long focus distances, the X100T is slightly sharper at the fastest aperture, despite being a lens designed more than five years ago (it is the same used by Fujifilm for all its X100 cameras thus far). to an off-camera location. Fujifilm X100 vs Fujifilm X100T, Lens catalogs: Canon Fujifilm Nikon Sony, Imaging info: Leica Glossary mFT-Glossary, Follow Apotelyt.com on Facebook | Twitter. The less rational side of me draws a comparison with smartphones and how the tech industry would react if, for instance, Apple releases an iPhone with the exact same chipset, and “only” OS-level improvements to make the phone faster. They have mostly improved in subtle, but meaningful ways with only a couple missteps. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges I never have, not even close, but I’ve read others complain about it. The latter is the most ridiculous given the WCL and TCL Converters would almost certainly not work with a new lens, but I digress. Like I said in Fuji Views, it’s WiFi that I’d really miss if I had to switch back to X100S. The X100T is less expensive and has bigger pixels. Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses. Fuji X100V (note lack of rear four-way controller). This enables the photographer to I had been putting this entire section off in anticipation of Fuji announcing some “Kaizen” action for the X100S. The X100 is still surprisingly usable, even 9 years later The X100S is the better used buy. Both the X100 and the X100T are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Viewfinder and rear monitor. I do wish the kept the grip found on the X100S in addition to the extra protrusion in the middle of the switch. The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models. In this review, we will be comparing X100F and X100T, two Large Sensor Compact cameras by Fujifilm. The X100F’s rear plate is more minimal in design than the X100T’s, with its controls more easily accessible with the right-hand thumb. The combination of the smaller screen and chunkier icons make the whole thing feel dated; a little like going back to a monitor that’s 1024 × 768. Both cameras have APS-C sensors but Fujifilm X100F has a 24.0 MP and Fujifilm X100T has a 16.0 MP resolution. One of the first things is that, yes, the X100T is quantifiably smaller and lighter than any camera I’ve thought to bring on a trip. Fuji vs. Fuji is site dedicated to comparing and contrasting Fujifilm X Series mirrorless cameras, FUJINON and X Mount compatible lenses, and related accessories. (Fuji had better spent a couple of dollars & throw in some weatherproofing gaskets as well). Another key difference regards the viewfinder. The optical quality remains the same but the X100F will be able to recognise them automatically when mounted (presumably via electronic contacts). The Fujifilm X100T has an intervalometer built-in. I think it’s a shame to add any size, bulk, or weight to such a wonderfully small camera. For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and I’ve grown so accustom to having extra batteries with my Fuji cameras that I’m rarely left without a charge, and I’m perfectly happy to slap my dead battery in the smaller third-party charger with an integrated flip-out plug I keep permanently stuck in an outlet when I get home. The act of selecting modes is much more sure, and precise. I find myself groping for the switch a few times before I get a hold of it. A comparison between the Fuji X100T, the X100S, and the X100. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. The odd one out is the DRIVE button on the X100T; it’s inexplicably soft. Yes the X-T10 has a slighter larger .62X magnification versus the X100T’s .50X, but they both have the same amount of pixels (2.36 million) and similar refresh rates. Love this feature. Viewfinder switch: The style of the switch has gone back to the original design. Is the Fujifilm X100 better than the Fujifilm X100T or vice versa? CAM-parator It has been notoriously easy to bump out of place on every Fuji camera to date aside from the X-T1. The gushing over this Film Simulation reached near intolerable levels for me, and actually made it less desirable to use. blacker. The X100V features a tilting LCD screen, but don’t get too excited. I reviewed it myself and fell in love with it but the price tag isn’t for everyone, neither is the fixed 24mm prime lens. Lens and autofocus. They nevertheless have the same format factor of 1.5. APOTELYT.com may earn a commission when you buy through certain links shown on this site. The power pack in the X100T can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling. The Shutter Speed dial extends the range of selection on the slow end, offering both ½ second and a full second clicks, and Exposure Compensation can now be dialled to ±3EV. If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. I don’t mean to suggest Flash is less important than conversions, but if you either want or don’t want the flash to fire, you know pretty quick if you’ve set it wrong. As a side note, the notion that this feature will not be seen on the X100S is a particularly tough pill to swallow after Zack Arias revealed that he had a “hacked” X100S with Classic Chrome on it. Since the X70 has both these features, they will hopefully come to the next iteration. The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. There may be a few others, but otherwise the user interface is an improvement. The Fujifilm FinePix X100 and the Fujifilm X100T are two enthusiast cameras that were announced, respectively, in September 2010 and September 2014. differ slightly in size. It features a classic rangefinder design that one could almost mistake for a Leica due to the hybrid viewfinder positioned on the upper left-hand side of the camera. X100S owners who aren’t prepared to upgrade are the first Fuji owners who are justified in feeling snubbed, however I’ll curb my concern about a shift in ethos until at least one more camera that should get features from an update, but doesn’t. If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, It is also now a touch… The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm X100T are ISO 200 to ISO 6400, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-51200. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. Both the X100F and the X100S are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Overall the top plate has cleaner lines. We’d never hear the end of it. We’ll start with hardware, but for those looking for a quick answer to the question about whether or not to buy, here it is: If you would like to purchase either of these cameras, or anything else for that matter, please consider using one of the affiliate links below. After a few firmware releases, it became what I would equate to a public beta. Unfortunately, the relationship was short. The evolutionary changes to the X100 always fall under two key categories, hardware, and software. I don’t expect anyone who isn’t quickly switching between both cameras would ever notice this though. Aperture ring: Personally I never had a problem with full stops on my aperture ring. Add to that the amount of new features, some of which are buried a little too deep for my liking and you end up with a UI that is less “discoverable” than it could be. As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, Fuji X100T vs Fuji X100 Jan 12, 2015 1 Hello all. Psychologically it might seems strange, but it’s perfectly comfortably and now add-ons are needed. This is principally used to help to speed up AF point selection, and is a very welco… Before I get into this Fuji X100T review, I’d like to start with a story, or moreover my history with Fuji X100 cameras.Sometimes there are failed dates, abortive love stories. capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software. APOTELYT.com has no affiliation with any of the equipment producers mentioned on this site and does not engage in retail trade. The focus ring, Shutter Speed dial, and Exposure Compensation dial all share the same look now, and the focus ring is much more grippy. Fortunately the gushing seems to have waned a little more recently. Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? Technology-wise, the X100T uses a more advanced image processing engine (EXR Processor II) I’m perfectly satisfied with 16MP. Slightly. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). In some ways I liked the dial, mostly for quickly scrolling through Fuji’s menus which tend to change with every camera. If I have to complain, it’s almost turns too easily. Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X100 and the Fujifilm X100T place the cameras among the top in their class? How about other alternatives? Now that I’ve had a good amount of time with the new UI of the X100T, going back to “old” is tough. At a quick glance, and even an extended examination by those who aren’t entrenched in the camera world, they are extremely similar. The OVF has seen a number of refinements for manual focusers. I wouldn’t have minded seeing improvements to noise handling or dynamic range, however. (with a pixel pitch of 4.80μm versus 5.53μm for the X100). Fuji are also bringing consistency to how their cameras operate. Surely the release of firmware version 2.0 for the X100 was a much more significant update than adding things like an extra Film Simulation mode and interval shooting. The X100T is a further refinement to Fuji’s X100 line. I had as side & fun camera besides my Canon and Leica gear a X100, X100T and X100F, the latter been stolen half a year ago. The processor is also much faster – Fuji used the same X Processor 4 CPU as we have previously seen on the Fuji X-T3 and X-Pro3 cameras. And finally, the dials take on a new cross-hatched grip which is decidely grippier. This ad and tracker-free website’s biggest source of support by far comes from you, its readers, at no cost. I bring this up here because these grips are thought to be necessary in part because of the layout. With the new camera, Fujifilm released the mark II versions of these converters. This makes the switch paradoxically easier to engage by accident, but less easy to turn on and off intentionally, particularly off. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. This ad and tracker-free site is made possible by the support its readers. The left Microphone and a small screw have lost the indentation that previously housed them. bigger. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. Just use the links below for any of your online shopping to help me keep testing, reviewing, and comparing. With the conversions lenses, you could capture quite a number of images before realizing you’ve set it wrong. Still, some potential customers would have loved a 180-degree articulating screen. The X100 has a resolution of 12.2 megapixels, whereas the X100T provides 16 MP. A comparison between the Fuji X100, X100S, X100T and the Fuji FUJINON XF 27mm f/2.8 including sharpness and bokeh. I really hope this isn’t the case as “Kaizen” has been one of the Fujifilm brand’s most lauded characteristics. amounts to 24.5 x 16.3 inches or 62.2 x 41.5 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 19.6 x 13.1 inches or 49.7 x 33.2 cm, and for However, the X100T is slightly lighter (1 percent) than the X100. Shutter release: Exactly the same threaded shutter release as found on previous models. The Fujifilm X100 is a series of digital compact cameras with a fixed prime lens.Originally part of the Finepix line, then becoming a member of the X series from Fujifilm, the X100 series includes the FinePix X100, X100S, X100T, X100F, and X100V. Rear buttons: I didn’t have any problem with the buttons on the left side of the LCD on the X100(S), but the X100T buttons are just as good functionally, and look better too. Now its time to decide between them or the upcoming X100f. Ultimately the pragmatic side of me wins. Fujifilm hadn’t updated the lens on the X100 series since the introduction of the … The maximum print size of the X100T for good quality output (200 dots per inch) choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there. If you’re into printing really large, I can understand why you might be griping about 16MP, but if you’re mostly sending your photos online, the main thing more than 16MP will get you is the need to buy more disk space sooner, and more computing power to deal with the files. It just made sense, and surely the Firmware Version 2.0 that the original X100 received was a far more significant. For information on product purchases, please check the website of your favorite online vendor. That’s why this is a “mini” review – I will just lay down my thoughts about the Fujifilm X100 and show you some image samples from the camera. The added resolution is more than welcome too. A lot of people will likely be adding Fuji’s thumb grip to their X100(S/T)’s. Thanks in advance for your kind support! The edge below the hotshoe has changed slightly, as did the contour around the Exposure Compensation dial. In this review, we will be comparing X100F and X100S, two Large Sensor Compact cameras by Fujifilm. If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information. Both cameras have APS-C sensors but Fujifilm X100F has a 24.0 MP and Fujifilm X100S has a 16.0 MP resolution. Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The Fujifilm FinePix X100 and the Fujifilm X100F are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in September 2010 and January 2017. Additionally, the slight adjustments made to the body has resulted in the lever portion of the Power Switch to be almost flush with the body. The X100 series has two optional accessories, the WCL wide-angle and TCL tele converters that change the angle of view of the lens to a 28mm or 50mm equivalent respectively. The Fujifilm X100 camera was a new chapter and its evolution through the X100S, X100T and the latest X100F has seen it become a little powerhouse of a camera. » Like really well. Fujifilm X100 vs X100F. Top Fn button: Fuji made slight changes to this button too. The aperture is the only metal part with grip that hasn’t been updated. I’ve ordered just yesterday a new X100F at a good price, but I’m still uncertain, if a M6M2 with ef-m22 wasn’t the same in weight and size with the advantage of adding a 35/1.4 in the pocket. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2. Shutter Speed and Exposure Compensation dials: Both of of these dials have improved, but the Exposure Compensation dial has improved a lot. If you’re anything like me though, you probably have an X-T1 as well that you could put your X100S’ SD card to transfer your shots to you iPhone. Another key component that hasn’t seen an update; the X100T contains the same EXR Processor II as the X100S. The price is the same for you, but a small percentage of the purchase price goes to me, which really helps keep this site going. It is notable that the X100T offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data The aperture ring on the X100T overall is an improvement though. Only 16MP. It’s also great to be able to change things like ISO and Film Simulation mode while still being able to see the screen, and in general the interface gets out of your way more to let you focus on shooting. Both the X100 and the X100T are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Sure, this will give better viewing angles when shooting in live view, but if you were thinking of vlogging with an X100, well, you’re out of luck. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel It reminds me of a high quality mouse wheel. Fujifilm X100T? It’s almost too hard to get off. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate. This better for both form, and function in my opinion. I really prefer the overall refresh in the “look and feel,” but find myself hunting the screen for things that used to be more quickly recognizable than they are now. The sensor and processor combination has been producing stellar images for over a year now, and it will continue to do so. Now I can quickly go from a slower minimum shutter speed and lower ISO range when I’m able to steady myself to faster shutter speeds with a larger ISO range when I’m walking down the street grabbing shots or shooting from the hip. It’s just the right distance from the back of the camera so you’ll never have any trouble turning it. Fujifilm X100T vs Fujifilm X100S Lens Specs Comparison Fujifilm X100T and Fujifilm X100S features 35 mm F2.0 Prime lenses so they have the same focal reach and light collecting ability. Perhaps this is a somewhat controversial stance on a Film Sim that’s so adored by many, but I don’t think it’s a feature worth choosing a camera for. (Plus X-T4 stuff), Breathing New Life Into Early X-Trans With Capture One, Advanced hybrid viewfinder, with electronic rangefinder (ERF), After focus is acquired during autofocus and real time on manual focus, 6 fps to a maximum of 25 frames (JPEG) or 3 to card capacity, 6 fps to a maximum of 31 frames (JPEG) or 3 to card capacity (Assumed), 3 or 5 fps to a maximum of 10 frames (JPEG), 1/32,000 of a second electronic, 1/4000 of a second mechanical at f/8-16, 1/2000 at f/4-5/6, 1/1000 at f/2-2.8, 1/4000 of a second mechanical at f/8-16, 1/2000 at f/4-5/6, 1/1000 at f/2-2.8, FUJINON 23mm f/2.0 fixed lens (35mm equivalent), Standard Q Menu (configurable to “RAW” button with firmware 2.0), “Up to” 700 photos per charge when using OVF only and Power Save mode on, Yes – More frame rate options, shoot video through OVF, manual exposure set during video, Slightly less deep126.5 (W) x 74.4 (H) x 53.9 (D) mm. Having to manually adjust the ISO settings when in auto was a bit of a pain. Focus Mode Selector: Overall an improvement. It was interesting to see how both cameras handled such broad dynamic range requirements. As an added bonus, the included cap now stays on well. Sony A6000 vs Fujifilm X100T: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. It houses a 16 megapixel X-Trans CMOS II … The Fuji x100 is a phenomenally successful camera, even 6 months after it hit store shelves it’s still in short supply. If you enjoy the content, you can help by using any of the links below. Arguably, given the X100’s target demographic, this may be a non-issue. It’s slightly larger, and is slightly less clicky, resulting in slightly worse tactile feedback. Which one should you buy? If I had my choice, I’d leave the rear of the top plate clean aside from the dial and move the DRIVE button down to the right of the BACK, where the Q Menu button is on the X100S. ... Fuji X100(S/T) vs. XF 23mm F1.4. This affiliate payment will not have any effect on the price that the vendor is charging you. If you want to make sure your Fuji pics look like as many other people’s as possible, the best thing you can do is shoot Classic Chrome these days. I’m pleased Fuji didn’t remove the threading with the addition of the Micro USB connector that brings RR-90 remote compatibility. The Fujifilm FinePix X100 and the Fujifilm X100T are two enthusiast cameras that were announced, respectively, Hi when Classic Chrome would be a consideration. 21.4 x 14.2 inches or 54.5 x 36.2 cm for good quality, 17.2 x 11.4 inches or 43.6 x 28.9 cm for very good quality, and 14.3 x 9.5 inches or 36.3 x 24.1 cm for Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the X100T provides a better video resolution than the X100. from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter.